BRANZ has been engaging with the building and construction sector with the aim of understanding, preparing for, and perhaps even helping the industry to shape the developments that will influence New Zealand's built environment between now and 2025.
This has produced some contrasting views of the built environment and the drivers of change between now and 2025. These views (stories or scenarios) have been based on scientific interpretation of the drivers of change in the built environment, coupled with key stakeholder views of the future. In short, the scenarios that emerge will not be predictions of the future, but entirely plausible depictions of what MAY happen should certain combinations of circumstance eventuate.
There are three reasons for undertaking this work:
Click on the links below to view more information.
The research project
STEEP
Inverviews
Creating the scenarios
An industry vision
The main purpose of the project is to impart structure and resilience to BRANZ's medium-to-long-term research agenda and to then inform an industry-wide vision building process, should agreement be reached that it is the logical next step for the industry.
In other words, BRANZ is aiming to develop a research agenda that serves the industry as effectively as possible. To achieve these objectives we need to understand the nature and the implications of the key drivers and trends in the New Zealand built environment - making this a research project.
The research questions are:
In order to develop a set of useful and plausible scenarios, it is first necessary to identify the drivers of change. These provide the essential feedstock for all subsequent foresight activities. STEEP analysis is the primary futures tool for identifying and monitoring the emergence, growth and coalescence of change.
This type of "horizon scanning" goes by a variety of aliases: STEER, STEEP, DESTEP, STEP, PESTE, PESTEL or PESTLE, PEST, STEEPLE, STEEPLED. The categories for analysis are the subject of much debate among foresight practitioners and academics. However, they all describe a framework of macro-environmental factors used in the environmental scanning component of strategic management and STEEP appears to be the least controversial and most commonly used. The Legal, Demographic and Ethics components are almost invariably covered (often more than once) within the other STEEP categories and will therefore not be considered separately in this project.
The elements of the STEEP analysis can be broadly summarised as follows:
Reports were commissioned from five authors covering the STEEP range identified above - they have been assembled into a single STEEP report.
Concurrently with the STEEP analyses, another important part of the process involved speaking to knowledgeable, respected industry players drawn from a variety of backgrounds. This is important because by their deliberate actions these people have the ability to directly alter the built environment in response to what they see coming, and their input brought a human dimension (of deliberate choice) to the range of potential futures.
The STEEP and interview stages of the project involved identifying the drivers of change. Once the main driving forces had been identified, it became apparent that some of them were pre-determined, that is, highly likely to occur and completely outside our control. Others were less certain. The critical uncertainties are central to the focal issue - the New Zealand built environment in 2025 - and are impossible to predict accurately.
Seven clusters of uncertainty emerged from a process of research and debate. It is usual to build each scenario around one critical uncertainty. However, our seven clusters led not, as you might expect, to seven scenarios but to four. After further reflection it became apparent that some of these clusters could be woven into more than one story line.
Previous experience has taught us that the more direct involvement people have with a scenario development process, the more they learn and the more they tend to discuss the issues raised with others. Accordingly, we endeavoured to include as large a cross-section of the industry as possible at every stage of our deliberations.
The Building The Future summary report, including the scenarios and the seven critical uncertainties, can be downloaded here (2.3MB).
The complete research report, including the scenarios, critical uncertainties, general uncertainties, predetermined elements, and the complete methodology and bibliography, can be downloaded here (3MB).
At BRANZ, the need for an umbrella industry vision leading into a series of broad industry strategies to achieve the vision is well understood. One of these strategies is expected to be an industry research strategy, below which would sit a series of specific research agendas. It is a reasonable expectation that there may also need to be a productivity strategy, an education strategy, and potentially even a sustainability strategy in some form. BRANZ has been proactive in supporting the development of such a vision and has augmented the process by engaging with the industry to create some plausible, defendable (research-based) scenarios to support the level of insight and innovation required to work with a 15-year planning horizon. These scenarios and their supporting report are the primary tangible output of the current BRANZ project and will be available to the industry to inform debate around a wider vision and strategy-setting discussion.
It is up to us, as an industry, to assess the implications of the scenarios and decide how to respond. The scenarios will provide us with a common language and concepts for thinking and talking about current events, and a shared basis for exploring future uncertainties and making more successful decisions.